Anarchist World VS Modern Society Part 1: Introduction and Relationships

Anarchy is an utopia, yes. However, for someone that hates all types of human societies, from Democracy to Dictatorship, it might be pleasurable to fantasize a little bit about the perfect world. I know, most of what is written lower is impossible. But maybe the fact you were educated in a democracy is making it absolutely impossible? 

In an Anarchist world, there are no countries. There are no borders. No leaders, no collective decision makers. Most of the earth's land surface is covered in forests. Humans live in small communities where everyone provides for himself. Morality and the instinct of having our specie live throughout the ages is keeping us alive. We don't need cars, we don't need electricity. The humans remember once again the joys of living without having the need to stare at a screen. Humans are healthy, strong and proud creatures.


In our modern society, it is a habit for a man to bring his significant other to eat out. This act is an act said to be ''Civilized''. However, if we do consider primitive humans as ''uncivilized'' we didn't do much progress. If would be reasonable for the savage to offer food to a female. That way, he shows her that he is capable of providing for her and their future family. Ironically enough, whom do you think usually pays for the lunch/dinner? It's quite daring to say we are civilized considering how deep our primitive instincts are in our minds.
The Anarchist world would present a totally different scenario. If the man and woman are to go to a restaurant, they would, certainly split the bill in half. Certainly, this is a very feminist statement. The thing is, in an Anarchist society, man and women would be equal. Each would provide for his own needs. The only time they would share what they have is when they have children.

In our modern society, marriage is still considered important. It is the popular opinion that a man should love only one woman and that is for a long time. Divorce is considered morally acceptable, yet one must pass by a complicated series of sharing and dividing.
In the Anarchist society, women and men are free to make love to whom ever they desire. Since duo-ownership is impossible, in the case when one leaves the couple each will take with him what belongs to him/her. Since there is no marriage, there is no divorce. Now one might ask what will happen to the children of separated parents. We have already established that humans will live in small communities where each will provide from himself, yet live close enough to help those in the need in order to satisfy his needs of interaction. Hence, since humans are kind creatures and cannot see the suffering of another, the children will be taken by one of the parents or adopted until they are capable of providing for themselves.